Category Archives: Editorials

Top Next Gen Players To Watch In This Year’s US Open

The US Open is about to begin and several of the most notable names on the men’s side are out. Others (Federer and Nadal) are still taking up the top seeds. While some of the best to ever play the game are still winning, there is a new generation of players working hard to climb the rankings. Here are the top players who can make a splash in this year’s US Open.

Denis Shapovalov

Shapovalov burst onto the scene in Montreal during the Rogers Cup when he surprised several top players in route to the semi final. The young Canadian opened eyes with notable wins over Juan Martin Del Potro, Rafael Nadal, and Adrian Mannarino. Playin gin his home country, the lefty electrified the crowd with a barrage of aces and winners. What made Shapovalov particularly entertaining to watch was his ability to hit winners off both wings from seemingly anywhere on the court.

What makes Shapovalov an interesting watch in the US Open this year is that we’ve seen him at probably his best in Montreal, but can he maintain that level? Prior to his breakthrough he was playing challenger tournaments and was ranked well outside the top 100. For this reason, nobody knows quite what to expect from him in this tournament. Making things even more fascinating is that his first round match is against fellow Next Gen player Danil Medvedev. If Shapovalov does make it a few rounds, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga will most likely be waiting for him in the third round.

Jared Donaldson

Looking for the next top American tennis player? It could very well be Jared Donaldson. Donaldson made his first major appearance at the US Open in 2014 and has been slowly climbing the rankings ever since. Now ranked 51st in the world he has gained entrance into every major this year and posted his best result at Wimbledon with a third round finish.

There’s reason to be optimistic that Donaldson can continue to rise given his performance in the Western & Southern Open where he defeated David Goffin in the first round and made it to the quarterfinal. Donaldson eventually went out in a close two set match to fellow American John Isner. If the 20 year old keeps playing like he has been, he could crack the top 30 in the next few years.

Karen Khachanov

Karen Khachanov

Karen Khachanov made his major debut in the US Open last year and hopes to surpass his second round finish from a year ago. This year, he made it past the first round in all three majors played and made it to the fourth round of the French. In Cincinnati Khatchanov had a surprising lost to Sugita from Japan but looks to rebound in the US Open where he has a nice draw. If the seeds hold true, Khachanov will have a third round date with 17th seeded Sam Querrey.

Out of the Next Gen players, Khachanov is the second highest ranked at 29th in the world. In less than two years he has gone from a relative unknown to one of the top young players in the game. He is definitely someone to keep an eye on going forward.

Alexander Zverev

By a wide margin, Alexander Zverev tops the list of top under 21 players. For over a year now tennis experts have been tabbing Zverev as not only a top 25 player but a future number one. This year, his best major finish was the fourth round at Wimbledon where he lost a tough five set match to Milos Raonic.

Zverev has had a great summer in which he climbed the rankings all the way to a four seed at the US Open. In addition to his high ranking, Zverev has the distinction of the only man on tour to win two Masters 1,000 events this year not named Nadal or Federer.

With a bevy of top players withdrawing from the US Open including Andy Murray and Stan Wawrinka, Zverev has a great chance to make some noise and potentially even win his first major.

The big four have enjoyed unprecedented longevity at the top of the game. However, this may be the generation that finally dethrones the top players and turns the sport over to the new guard. Fans may see this process in action at this year’s US Open


Western & Southern Open Headlines

Half way through the Western & Southern Open, there have already been many surprises. The Western & Southern in Cincinnati serves as the closest thing to a US Open warm up tournament with many players using it as a dress rehearsal. Here are some of the early headlines from the tournament.

Alexander Zverev
Alexander Zverev

David Ferrer’s Resurgence

Remember when David Ferrer was one of the top ten players in the world and a legitimate contender to make it to the second week of majors? After a short stretch of poor play causing Ferrer to drop out of the top 30, it looks like he’s back. The 35 year old is into the quarterfinals after two three set matches and a 6-4 6-4 win over Pablo Carreno Busta. In Montreal Ferrer went toe to toe with Roger Federer losing in three sets. He may not be a threat to win the title this year but it is nice to see Ferrer finding his game again.

Shavopalov’s Absence

Last week in Montreal the tennis world was captivated by 18 year old Denis Shapovalov. After making it to the semifinal before losing to Alexander Zverev, the tennis world is eager to see if he can follow up his performance. Unfortunately, the tennis world will have to wait until the US Open qualifying in order to see him on the big stage again. The reason he isn’t in the Western & Southern Open is that he was already scheduled to play a challenger tournament in Canada. Watch for Shapovalov to be a story again when the US Open qualifying rounds begin.

Sock’s Disappointing Tournament

Cincinnati looked promising for Jack Sock. Roger Federer withdrew from the tournament leaving the young American as the top seed in his quarter. Primed to make a deep run and assert himself as the top player in the country, Sock promptly fell flat losing to world number 46 Yuichi Sugita in two sets. Young players frequently lose to players below their ranking and ability level as they make their way through the ATP tour. However, with Sock it seems that this happens more regularly than it does to other players. This year’s US Open represents Socks best chance yet to make a run with many top players out. It may be now or never for Sock to prove himself.

American Semifinalist

With Sock struggling, other Americans are stepping up. In fact, an American is guaranteed to be in the semifinal as John Isner takes on upstart Jared Donaldson.  Donaldson took down twelfth seeded Roberto Bautista Agut in the first round and cruised to the quarterfinal. Isner benefited from Frances Tiafoe upsetting Alexander Zverev in the second round. Keep an eye on Donaldson in this match up as he has a bright future ahead of him on the tour.

Jared Donaldson
Jared Donaldson

Zverev’s Loss

After his second Masters 1000 title of the year in which he defeated Roger Federer, Alexander Zverev had a huge let down against fellow next gen player Frances Tiafoe. Tiafoe is ranked 87th in the world and has a lot of natural athleticism. Even so, given how well Zverev has been playing recently, this is as big of an upset as any in the tournament thus far. Look for Zverev to get back on track and be a real contender for his first major title.

With the quarterfinals all set, the final rounds of the Western & Southern Open promise to be exciting. It serves as a great lead in to the US Open which will be equally wide open.

Is No Ad Scoring Coming To Wimbledon?

One of the biggest problems for Men’s tennis was on display earlier this week when several players retired early in their first round matches. Alexander Dolgopolov retired after only 43 minutes on the court vs. Roger Federer and Martin Klizan quit in a similar fashion against Novak Djokovic. Even some of the top players got into the mix with Nick Kyrgios retiring in the third set of his first round match. In all, seven men retired in their first round matches which had Wimbledon players and analysts alike scrambling to find a solution. Some suggestions included prize money re-distribution, changing to a 2 out of 3 set format, and most shocking of all, no ad scoring.

The Problem

Players on the men’s side retiring is not a new problem in major tennis. As the year goes on, players get worn down by the arduous pro tour. By the time Wimbledon and the US Open roll around many have nagging injuries and would most likely be better served not playing at all. However, the key to the issue is the prize money. Even in a first round loss, a player in the draw banks 40,000 dollars for singles. This prompts many players to show up for their match, retire once they are too hurt to play or even if they don’t feel like playing. Then they collect their check and go home. A lot of times the players that aren’t in the top 25 need the money to help continue their career or pay for general expenses. This means that these retirements often take place on outside courts in matches that fans aren’t particularly invested in. This time however, it happened on the biggest stage at the most prestigious tournament.

Nick Kyrgios

In major tournaments, fans pay big money to see their favorite tennis players on the grandest venues. As a result, it came as a shock when both Djokjovic and Federer’s opponents retired after each playing less than two full sets of tennis. This means that fans expecting to watch hours of competitive tennis got to see less than an hour per match. These unfortunate back to back retirements on center court prompted many to call for changes to be made.

Posed Solutions

As reports of retirements continued to flood in, a flurry of potential solutions were discussed. Changing the system that prize money is awarded was a hot topic. Some suggested paying players even if they withdraw before the tournament starts. This seems like it could lead to players purposefully withdrawing to collect a check without having to do anything. Pam Shriver chimed in saying that she believes the real reason for the retirements is that best three out of five sets is too grueling for the players. The ATP tour events are played in the form of best two out of three but the majors are known for their longer duration. When Chris Evert put forth the idea of no ad scoring in majors as a way to eliminate injuries and prevent early retirements several of the other analysts chuckled. However, what if it isn’t such a crazy idea?

How is No Ad Used In Tennis?

No ad scoring is used in some forms of tennis such as world team tennis, the mixed gender, team based competition played on those multi colored courts. It has also found its way into Division I college tennis. The purpose of no ad is to speed up the game and eliminate the long back and forth deuce games. While no ad rubs most traditional players the wrong way, some praise it for making the game more exciting as each deuce point comes with more pressure.

Changing to no ad scoring would indeed make matches shorter. It would also most likely generate more parity and upsets as more games could be won on lucky points. This idea seems to fly in the face of pro tennis’ identity which is based on the best player coming out victorious in a physically demanding match. Going to no ad would eliminate some of the wear and tear but it would also eliminate the conditioning and endurance fact that makes the game challenging

It’s highly unlikely that any major scoring changes will take place at the four major tournaments any time soon. Tennis is a sport that generally prides itself in its tradition and only tampers with it when absolutely necessary. With a plethora of other solutions available to try, some changes may be coming, but most likely none that will negatively impact the viewing experience of the fans.

Who Is The 700th Ranked Player On The Men’s Tour?

The number 700 has been tossed around ever since John McEnroe said that’s where Serena Williams would be ranked if she played on the men’s tour. This idea has drawn criticism and praise alike, but does anyone know who the 700th ranked man on tour is?

John McEnroe has recently been in the news for a comment he made regarding Serena Williams. McEnroe called Serena the best player on the women’s tour. When pressed for an answer as to why he qualified the statement by calling her the best “female” player as opposed to the best player overall, he stated that Serena would not be a top player on the men’s tour. He went on to say that if Serena played against the men she would be “like, number 700 in the world.”

Whether or not that statement is factual is really anybody’s guess. However, the number 700 in the world has been the topic of discussion as a benchmark separating the men’s and women’s tours according to McEnroe’s statement. So who is the 700th ranked player on the men’s tour?

Who Is Number 700?

While ATP rankings change frequently, the honor of number 700 in the world currently belongs to Issam Haitham Taweel. The 27 year old was born in Aleppo, Syria but represents Egypt. He is right handed, has a two-handed backhand, and his favorite playing surface is hard court.

Issam Haitham Taweel

Most of Issam’s career has been spent playing ITF Pro Circuit events. This year he has an 8-14 record when combining ATP and ITF tournaments. His career record is 145-212. He has spent some time competing in ATP tournaments and has a career record of 2-5 in those draws. His career high singles ranking was achieved in 2014 when he cracked the top 700 at 635. His current doubles ranking is slightly higher than his singles ranking at 643.

Could He Beat Serena?

At this point everyone can only speculate about whether or not Issam could defeat Serena in a match. That being said, this is a great opportunity for the number 700 in the world. Issuing a challenge to Williams to play him in a match after she is back from having her baby would be a great way to get his name out there. Even if Williams declined the challenge, people would at least know his name and know that he was up for the challenge.

Serena Williams

What It Means

McEnroe followed up his comments by later stating that he regretted making the statement saying he had no idea how much it would snowball. However, he did not retract it. He said comparing the men’s and women’s tour is comparing “apples to oranges.” This is most certainly true considering the players from each tour almost never compete against each other in a serious format.

For Issam, this could be the opportunity of a lifetime. Whether he likes it or not, people are now aware of his name simply because of circumstance. Simply because he is lucky 700.

Does Doubles Matter in the USA?

Ever since Andy Roddick won the US Open in 2003, the United States has been looking for a men’s champion. The seventeen year drought has been highlighted by several early round losses and struggles on clay. Surprisingly, an American man won the championship at Roland Garros just mere weeks ago, so why is it that nobody is talking about it?

Fourteen days ago American tennis player Ryan Harrison felt the immense triumph of winning his first grand slam title. Of course, the tennis world would soon be abuzz with headlines about America being back on top of the tennis world. That didn’t happen though. Instead, very few people were even aware of the Harrison’s victory. The reason for this was simple. It wasn’t the singles tournament that Harrison won, but rather the French Open doubles title.

The Problem For Doubles

Doubles can be an extremely entertaining spectacle. There are fast serves, quick volleys, and way more overhead smashes than in any singles match. While the doubles game is certainly a favorite of recreational players, it never caught on as a televised sport with the exception of the Olympics. For this reason, the doubles draw in majors has been forgotten by main stream sports fans. Even the most hardcore professional tennis fans seem to pay little attention to anything but singles. So what is it about our culture that makes people ignore doubles?

TV Time

It’s hard to say which came first for doubles, the lack of popularity leading to less TV time, or less TV time leading to a lack of popularity. Either way, with the two on two format taking the back seat, fans are all in for singles.

In a world where tennis isn’t a prominent television sport, even most majors don’t get much air time in the United States. The one exception to this rule is the US open when primetime matches are shown on popular networks. The issue is that the primetime slots are always taken by big name singles players. Doubles does get occasional TV coverage at the US Open but it’s usually still rare. This general lack of national exposure means tennis enthusiasts will naturally be more interested by what they’ve seen before on TV. This brings us back to the original question, which came first between lack of air time and lack of popularity. The star power of the singles players most likely led to more TV time which then proliferated a cycle in which viewership drives popularity which drives more air time for singles.


With singles garnering more exposure than doubles, the top tennis players in the world opt to play singles. This has always given the impression that doubles players aren’t the world’s best but rather what’s left over after the top athletes are removed. While there is an element of truth to this, it isn’t entirely accurate. Doubles and singles are actually vastly different. The two variations of the game require different strategy and skill set to perfect. A singles player with great ground strokes but average volleys may struggle playing doubles but flourish in singles. The same is true for players with great volleys and average ground strokes finding double success while never achieving a high singles ranking. While it’s true that most top doubles players wouldn’t fare well in the singles draw, the same could be said about a lot of the top singles players, but that doesn’t stop the perception of doubles players being lesser from being proliferated.

15101481805_0db839db4c_o (1)
Bryan Brothers

US Culture

Another aspect of singles that Americans tend to gravitate toward is the idea of being alone in the spotlight. America (even more so than other countries) values individual accolades and achievement. Singles provides the opportunity to be the only one taking credit for victories. In the doubles game, that attention is split in half.

For a long time the United States of America the top ranked doubles team in the world in the Bryan brothers. Bob and Mike Bryan dominated doubles winning majors and making a name for themselves. While the Bryan brothers did achieve some level of stardom, they weren’t enough to get the US excited about tennis or for people to hold them in the same esteem as a Roger Federer or a Rafael Nadal. To complicate things further, doubles teams often consist of players from different countries. For example, Harrison won with Michael Venus from New Zealand. This means that while Harrison is American, the team that won isn’t a true American team. Pairings such as this are extremely common but seem random without knowing the backstory of the duo. To many viewers it cheapens the victory.

What It Means

Doubles may never be as popular as singles in the world of professional tennis. That doesn’t mean that Harrison’s accomplishment should go unnoticed. The guy won a major championship and beat out many of the best players in the world. Hopefully this victory will be a springboard for his career that will propel him to even more accomplishments in the future.

Is Jelena Ostapenko Bad For Women’s Tennis

In a French Open women’s draw void of Serena Williams and Maria Sharapova. The WTA tour desperately needed its top players and biggest names to show up. Instead, what it got was a 20 year old Latvian named Jelena Ostapenko.

Who Is Jelena Ostapenko?

Prior to the 2017 French Open, Ostapenko had very little success in majors. In 2015 she made it to the second round of Wimbledon and the US Open (the only two major draws she was in.) In 2016 she went out in the first round of each major but made a small breakthrough in 2017 getting to third round of the Australian Open earlier this year. She came into Roland Garros with a world singles ranking of 47 and a doubles ranking of 34. Little did everyone know that this dark horse would be the one to get through the women’s draw and end up in the final, defying all odds and expectations. While such an achievement deserves to be applauded, many critics of the sport are pointing to Ostapenko’s meteoric rise as something that is wrong with women’s tennis.

What’s The Problem?

In most major sports in the United States, fans crave underdog stories. If an eight seed in the NBA wins a series or even a game the sports world goes wild. If a lowly MLB team has a huge turnaround and becomes a contender everybody is excited about it. In fact, there is even an entire sporting event built around Cinderella storylines and upset victories in the NCAA Basketball Tournament. How then could this possibly be a bad thing for women’s tennis? It all has to do with the nature of the sport.

In any of the major sports leagues in the United States (MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA) teams represent cities, states, or regions. Plus, they are comprised of numerous players each having they own following. In professional tennis, for most of the year the players are competing as individuals. Each pro tennis player represents their country of origin and is backed completely by that country, but even so, international star power can be hard to come by for someone hailing from a smaller nation. Not all players can generate international buzz. For example, a consistent top player such as Serena Williams, Maria Sharapova, or even Angelique Kerber can draw international fans with TV appearances, commercials, and press conferences. Before this year’s French Open, most sports fans probably didn’t even know who Jelena Ostapenko was. They still may not.

Not A New Issue

The same thing has happened in women’s tennis for a while now. In 2010 Francesca Schiavone won the French Open and then made it back to the final the year after. In 2012 the former champion wasn’t close to as competitive as she had been the previous two years and hasn’t made it past the fourth round of a major since 2011. The same thing happened in the 2016 Olympics when Monica Puig won gold. Before her stunning victory she had only made it to the fourth round of a major once and hasn’t made it past the third since. Some other women who appeared to be on the verge of becoming perennial contenders and then seemingly disappeared are Sloane Stephens, Caroline Wozniacki, and Eugenie Bouchard. All of whom were expected to be the next big thing in women’s tennis but have failed to live up to the expectations.

Monica Puig

It’s interesting that this could be a bad thing for a sports league considering how all of the major US sports are desperate to create parity, but the WTA is more in need of lasting star power. They need a dependable, likable face of women’s tennis to carry the torch after Serena, Venus, and Sharapova retire. This is difficult to find when the players contending for major wins seemingly rise and fall like the tide.

The WTA would certainly prefer some of the more well-known players such as Caroline Wozniacki and Eugenie Bouchard to be the ones making it to the finals. If Ostapenko can continue to make a name for herself and contend for major titles regularly, she could end up being huge for the women’s game. However, if she is just another flash in the pan women’s tennis will continue to struggle to build a foundation that general audiences will want to tune in to see.

2017 Men’s French Open Tennis: Can Anyone Prevent “La Decima”?

La Decima – The meaning of “Tenth” in Spanish. Soccer fans, especially Real Madrid fans, are familiar with these two words as their club recently won a 10th Champions League Title (the biggest title in European soccer).

However, Rafael Nadal may bring new meaning to these words to the tennis world. Ironically, Rafael Nadal is an honorary member of Real Madrid. He looks to make “La Decima” his own by winning his 10th French Open. While he has not won the French Open since 2014, let’s take a look at his recent results and the other contenders.

This year, Rafael Nadal is 13-1 on clay (Lost to Dominic Thiem in Italy). He has won Monte Carlo and Barcelona. While this may not come as a surprise to anyone who has followed tennis since 2004, the only startling statistic is that he only beat one top 10 player on clay so far. He bested #9 Dominic Theim of Austria 6-1 6-4 on the 30th of April. Nadal is 4-3 against playing a Top 10 player in the world. Gael Monfils (Was #7, now #16) and Milos Raonic. His early rounds will be “boring” if you aren’t a Nadal fan because of how quintessential his game is. However, with his recent injury problems, later rounds going best 3 out of 5 sets may give the other players in the draw some hope.

While Nadal seems to be the favorite to win. There are several players that may get the way of his coveted tenth French Open title. Here are the most likely candidates looking to prevent history from being made.

The Top Class

Andy Murray, World #1. While that ranking may mean he is the “best in the World”, he is only 16-7 this year and has only won one title (Dubai). Since his loss to #2 Novak Djokovic in Qatar in January, he is 11-4 with no wins against any Top 10 player. In fact, the highest ranked player he has beaten this season since Qatar is #15 Lucas Pouille. We know Andy can produce positive results, as he has won 3 Grand Slams and made the French Open final last year. However, with his nagging injury problems, it would be a surprise to see him in the final. Look for a great match-up in the third round with Juan Martin Del Potro!

Novak Djokovic, World #2 and defending French Open Champion. Since his only title this season in Qatar, he is 20-6 and has yet to beat a top 15 player since. With new injury problems forcing him out of recent tournaments, grinding it out on the clay may be tough to do for several rounds. Now that he’s wearing Lacoste, perhaps the crocodile will give him some French inspiration to defend his title! The Fourth round will be his first real test against Lucas Pouille, a  young Frenchmen on the rise!

Stan Wawrinka, World #3 and 2015 French Open Champion. While his record of 20-8 is almost parallel with Murray, he has 1 title this season in Geneva on clay. Tennis fans know that for some reason, Stan can never play his 100% best until it’s a Grand Slam. It’s why people think Murray is worlds better than him but their par in Grand Slam titles, with Wawrinka actually having won a French. We look for him to have a very successful tournament. Would love to see 3rd round against Fabio Fognini!

The Other Guys

#5 Milos Raonic. Injury problems have kept him from reaching his full potential so far this season, until recently. He heads into Roland Garros with a 19-6 record. He has reached two finals this year, withdrawing against #15 Jack Sock in Delray Beach and losing a close two set match on clay to #7 Marin Cilic in Istanbul. His serve, forehand, and great movement for a big guy will keep him in most matches. If he can make it, a fourth round battle vs Dimitrov could be an exciting match.

#6 Dominic Thiem. The youngest top 10 player and most active. He is 29-12 with a lone title this season that he won in Rio. He made it to the Semifinals last year at Roland Garros, and is on pace for a similar result this season if he continues to grow as a player. He is Rafael Nadal’s lone loss on clay this year so look for him to make an impact in the draw. A semifinal appearance could be in the cards.

#7 Marin Cilic. He has a clay court championship this year which puts him above most of the playing field. Similar to Raonic, his forehand, flat backhand and big serve will keep him in a lot of matches. However, it’s tougher for him against a top five opponent to keep his movement and point construction fluid.

#8 Kei Nishikori. Since Brisbane in January, he has no wins over any top 25 players. Injury problems, which seems to be a big thing for these top 8 players, has taken a toll on Nishikori’s season. Maybe he can piece it all together and stay healthy for a deep run at Roland Garros. His best result at the French is the Quarterfinals in 2015. His backhand is something that any tennis player wishes they could hit just for a set, along with his “Brick Wall” mentality.

#9 Alexander “Sasha” Zverev of Germany who is the youngest player in the top 25 (20 years old) and won Munich this year on clay. His down the line backhand and big inside out forehand, accompanied with his 140mph serve, will always make for a difficult match for his opponent. Some experts thought Zverev would be a legitimate threat to win the title. However, he went out in the first round to former top ten player Fernando Verdasco.

Impact Players

#10 David Goffin. He made it to last year’s Quarterfinals and has had mixed results on clay this season. He beat Thiem and Djokovic in Monte Carlo but lost to #42 Karen Khachanov (20 years old) of Russia in Barcelona in the Round of 16. His touch game, paired with his ability to place the ball and slice will make him formidable against a top 10 player on clay.

#11 Grigor Dimitrov of Bulgaria who made the Semifinals of the Australian Open this year. The next “Federer” to some of the media because of his backhand and mirror image on other strokes, he has failed to make a Grand Slam final at the age of 25.

#12 Jo Wilfried Tsonga of France who has made two French Open Semifinal appearances in 2013 and 2015. So far he has not lived up to the “Next Great French Hero” as he has only made one Grand Slam Final (Australian Open 2009). However, he’s always a fun player to watch as his movement is quick and his strokes are strong.

#18 Nick  Kyrgios of Australia is the second player in history to beat Djokovic, Nadal and Federer in their initial meetings. His mentality can push him to the heights of a Grand Slam champion but it can also hold him back from beating a top 50 player.

#29 Juan Martin Del Potro of Argentina who won the Silver Medal at last years Olympics in Rio looks to make a splash. His big hitting game is something that no player wants to face early on in the tournament.

Bouncy House Candidates

These players can produce wonderful results against big time players but could also drop out within the first three rounds of any Grand Slam. Regardless, they always provide a match to see as their game or personality is intriguing.

#21 John Isner of America. “Mr. Serve” should be his nickname. He and #23 Ivo Karlovic of Croatia serve their way into some great matches and out of some pressure situations. If you want to see a masterclass serving display, look no further than these two players. On the other hand, don’t expect much else of a match unless these two completely revitalize their backhands to compete against the top five in a best of five sets.

#24 Richard Gasquet of France. Had his deepest French Open run last year into the Quarterfinals. His one-hander dazzles all viewers of his game but not having a win over a top 50 player on clay so far provides some concern for his fans.

#28 Fabio Fognini of Italy. He has the power and game to win against Tsonga, Nishikori and oust Andy Murray in straight sets on Clay this year. However, he is also capable of losing against non top 150 players. He went a full 3 sets in Madrid vs Nadal.

At this year’s French Open, look for several players to make some noise and potentially even beat out the top players. Check out the Vegas odds below and enjoy the tournament!

Nadal 4:5
Djokovic 3:1
Wawrinka 10:1
Murray 11:1
Alex Zverev 11:1
Thiem 11:1
Nishikori 33:1
Del Potro 40:1
Goffin 50:1
Tsonga 50:1
Kyrgios 50:1
Cilic 66:1
Monfils 66:1
Raonic 66:1
Dimitrov 66:1
Steve Johnson 750:1